Wednesday, July 12, 2006

How I've come to know Gilad Shalit

This is an interesting article published in the Toronto Star, passed on to me by a friend

I know Gilad Shalit. Not personally, but I could tell you what he looks like, his age, where he went to school, his hometown, his father's name, what his father looks like, and how he weeps for his son.

I know that this is not the first time that the Shalit family has felt the emotional impact of armed conflict. I know that during the Arab-Israeli war, Gilad's uncle, Yoel, was killed. I know that Gilad's brother is named after Yoel.

I know that his brother attends university in Haifa and is worried about him. I know that Gilad is being held by Palestinians after his army outpost was raided and Gilad was captured.

I know that Gilad is the first Israeli soldier captured by Palestinians since 1994. I know Gilad's friends describe him as a peaceful and quiet young man.

I know that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has spoken with Gilad's father. I know that Olmert has assured Galid's father that everything in his power is being done to secure the release of his son.I

also know that the "everything" Prime Minister Olmert speaks of includes the collective punishment of the Palestinian people by further military incursions into their territory, destroying Palestinian infrastructure and cutting their power supply, leaving families in the dark.

I know these things because I watch the nightly news and read the daily paper. Since his capture, I have been unable to avoid the image of Gilad Shalit and the life and history behind this image.

What I do not know is the names and faces of the hundreds of Palestinian children held in Israeli jails.

I could not tell you about their brother or sister, whether they would like to go to university, or whether they have a dead relative for whom they were named after.

Nor could I tell you about the thousands of Palestinian men and women who are held by the Israeli state without charge or trial. I could not tell you whether their friends and family describe them as peaceful or quiet.

These people are nameless, faceless, reduced to bare life — human beings not entitled to rights, dignity and respect.

Nor do they merit the attention of the BBC, The Globe and Mail, Ha'aretz, or The New York Times.

Unless of course they engage in an act of violence so horrific, so apparently unexplainable and incomprehensible that they must be subject to biography, psychological profiling, a where-did-it-all-go-wrong-for-the-aspiring-fun-
loving-university-student-type docudrama.

Apparently their suffering does not deserve the attention of the media.

Their incarceration is not the stuff of headlines in the national media. Their detainment is without explanation and justification in the op-ed section of the dailies or subject to the analysis of talking heads on the evening news.

No ink will be spilled over their life stories.And here lies the tragedy of the Palestinian people. Here lies the tragedy for many of us.

We only know Gilad Shalit. [source]

Technorati technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

16 Comments:

  • At 7/12/2006 3:09 AM, Blogger مترجم سوري said…

    yes the whole world only cares about Israel and only see israel's 'tragedy'

    thanks for sharing us

    http://wahadiftiraadi.blogspot.com/2006/06/blog-post_28.html

     
  • At 7/12/2006 11:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I love this article. It's pretty bold of The Star to publish it.

     
  • At 7/12/2006 12:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Boo freakin hoo

     
  • At 7/12/2006 12:44 PM, Blogger Abufares said…

    Every once in a while we hear an objective voice in the west. These voices are so few and so far apart that they hardly make an impact in the hubbub of Israeli propaganda and total control of the media.

    Many of us still don't get it, however.

    Israel is not a neighbor whom we should seek to please and not to offend. Israel is our powerful enemy.

     
  • At 7/12/2006 3:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    How about seeking to avoid war and signing a treaty?

    How about reining in Hezbollah?

    What that? Oh yeah, the Palestinians. Like Syria gives a shit. Just keep the pot boiling so you don't have to sort out your own internal issues while everyone is preoccupied with Israel.

    Now I have to go back to pulling the strings with the Media, after all, I control it!

     
  • At 7/12/2006 6:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Anonymous, how about stop building illegal settlements on lands Israel has so "graciously" "given back" to indigenous Palestinians?
    How about stop demolishing Palestinian civilian homes that happen to lie in the path of the illegal "security barrier"?
    How about letting go of innocent women and children held captive in Israeli prisons?

    At least we know Gilad Shalit did something to deserve being kidnapped, he participates in an army that justifies the collective punishment of a whole ethnic group, while those women and children in jail? They're just women and children. In jail. Facing no charges or convictions, whatsoever.

    How about avoiding war and giving people the rights they deserve?

     
  • At 7/12/2006 9:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "Given back".. you mean like Gaza?
    What illegal settlements? What "illegal" security barrier? Illegal according to whom?
    What "innocent" women? You mean Amuna Mona?
    Shalit "deserved" to be kidnapped? At least here you forgot your Taqiyyah and were honest that he was kidnapped and not "captured".

    In Southern Lebanon the Shi'ites were passing the candy around when they heard the soldiers were kidnapped today. Explain how that is possibly any good for lebanon.

     
  • At 7/12/2006 10:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Let's be honest, Israel wouldn't have existed if a bunch of radical Zionists hadn't decided to kick out the indigenous population of Palestinians from the area, then be "nice" and leave two pieces of land so that the million people they had displaced could somewhat remain in the area and not technically be called refugees, Gaza and the West Bank, the Palestinian Territories.
    The 1967 borders ring a bell? No Israeli settlements should be on the Eastern side of that border in the West Bank, and currently, there are dozens of Israeli settlements in the West Bank sitting on top of the huge aquifers of fresh groundwater, the only remaining source of freshwater after you had so beautifully drained Lake Tiberias and polluted the Jordan River. And there were many illegal settlements in Gaza before the IDF withdrew. Your apartheid wall has also been declared as illegal by the International Court of Justice (a UN body)in 2004. Is a UN body not credible anymore? The wall completely misses the 1967 border and instead goes in and out of the West Bank making sure the illegal settlements are joined with Israel proper.

    Do you mean to say that Zionists didn't rejoice in the murder of a quadriplegic by a rocket on a holy Muslim place of worship? If there was mourning in Israel, then the candy-passing over a kidnapping is of course, a no-no.

    I am 100% positive that the thousands of women in Israeli prisons are not all Amina Monas. Is your government 100% sure that they all are? How is it justified? Do you see the PA detaining Israeli women and children? If you're calling this a war, then there are rules in wars, and that is you leave alone the women and children.

    I'm afraid I don't understand the random Arabic words you're tossing around.

     
  • At 7/13/2006 7:35 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    You seem very intellectual, now can you answer my other questions?

    I didn't think so.

    3 kidnapped IDF soldiers? Too bad. Boo-hoo. Get over it.

     
  • At 7/13/2006 8:45 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Queenie, your ISM handlers have done a great job with you. What are you, maybe 25 at the most?
    You've been a good girl, you've learned to parrot their talking points with gusto.

    Wake up and take a look at what your overseers are peddling to this region. I hope you are pleased with yourself looking at what is happening today. What did you really think would be the outcome of provoking the Israelis?

     
  • At 7/13/2006 9:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    provoking the israelis? :|

     
  • At 7/13/2006 8:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    anonymous, I have to agree with queenie, By the way I am pushing sixty and have been around and the only thing I see that you like is attention even if it is negative. Time for you to do your history. Your remarks about Mona are without merit. You are an ignorant american. You are a disgrace to the rest of us Americans. It is sad now that you can't get your head out of the sand and see what is really the truth. Israel is wrong, the UN voted and had ten votes for sanctions against them. But our scared and greedy government was the only veto that killed the sanctions. Wake up and get the chip off your shoulder.

     
  • At 7/14/2006 8:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Your remarks about Mona are without merit

    Howzat?

    Sorry Chet, but Israel won't bend over satisfy you.

     
  • At 7/16/2006 11:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Well, we know that you won't bend.
    Just a correction, the Palestinians did not leave because the Arabs asked them, but because they were forced to by people like you ... and I know because I was one of them. I was eight years old.

     
  • At 7/17/2006 2:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    1967 is not a border, but a cease-fire line. Border could and should be negotiated, but instead it seems like the Palestinians voted for an unrealistic dream (Hamas=Great Palestine) instead of reality (figuring out a way for two nations to live together).

    I fail to see the light at the end of the tunnel...

     
  • At 11/25/2006 12:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Excellent, love it!
    » » »

     

Post a Comment

<< Home